Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Ellerman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) 2pou (talk) 22:58, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

David Ellerman

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

David Ellerman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

apparent unsourced autobiography Szarka (talk) 19:53, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment and apparently edited by the article subject. Mccapra (talk) 20:02, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:03, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Delete It seems like a very well-written third-person resume to me. The only article I can find about him is are articles that he wrote, and a "[he] [argues] [this]" mention in this article. I also notifed ‎Davidellerman.  Darth Flappy ^«Talk» 21:20, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Looks to be this person: https://scholar.google.co.uk/citations?hl=en&user=mOltFLwAAAAJ? -Kj cheetham (talk) 08:33, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep I reworked the article to avoid the WP:COPYVIO and WP:NOTCV issues and to source appropriately. In particular, I added 7 reviews of 3 books, which I think is a fairly clear pass of WP:NAUTHOR. His citation record also looks like it's probably strong enough for WP:NPROF. I'd appreciate it if others could watchlist this article against coi editors (Slovenia is a small country, and while I've never had any interaction with Ellerman, I suppose it's likely that I eventually might). Russ Woodroofe (talk) 18:40, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per WP:PROF#C1, WP:AUTHOR, and the 15 published book reviews of 5 books now in the article. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:45, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as now passes WP:AUTHOR and is a case of WP:HEY. -Kj cheetham (talk) 19:56, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 16:05, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 16:05, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Slovenia-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 16:05, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 16:05, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per all of the above. Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 13:17, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep His Scholar profile shows he passes criteria 1 of WP:NACADEMIC. Walwal20 ^{talk ▾ contribs} 22:40, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.