Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Ting

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:32, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

David Ting

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

David Ting (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO. No inherent notability in the positions he has held. LibStar (talk) 04:32, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Hong Kong. Shellwood (talk) 07:32, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete none of the positions described would make the subject notable. There are other David Tings who might be notable, but this one isn’t. Mccapra (talk) 12:01, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment What does "head of office" mean in terms of the EU commission? Would it count for NPOL #1? Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 18:14, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No not an NPOL pass. It’s like “chief of staff” or “general manager”. Mccapra (talk) 07:49, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, delete for lack of notability. Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 16:04, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.