Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David aaron clark
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was no consensus. W.marsh 01:53, 28 June 2006 (UTC) Ammending decision to keep --W.marsh 13:11, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I can find no evidence that this person meets the recommended criteria for inclusion of biographies. The article alleges that he has received an AVN Award but that's not, in my opinion, a very high bar.
Note: This article has previously been nominated for "prod" deletion. That deletion was disputed by the article's principle author.
Note 2: If kept, this page desperately needs clean-up. It currently reads more like a CV than an encyclopedia article. Rossami (talk) 22:56, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete Right now, despite great efforts by the author, no notability. In addition, the profusion of red dead links really doesn't work; but that's a side issue. Interlingua talk 23:07, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The AVN Award makes him meet WP:PORN BIO. The Geogre's Law violation needs to be fixed, of course. AnonEMouse (squeak) 15:35, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Deathphoenix ʕ 14:16, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Definitely Keep per WP:PORN BIO. - CrazyRussian talk/email 15:18, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per CrZ. Needs a massive cleanup though. Stu ’Bout ye! 15:43, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep and cleanup, meets WP:PORN BIO Jumbo Snails 18:19, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.