Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dawn Metropolis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Anamanaguchi#2006.E2.80.932009:_Power_Supply_and_Dawn_Metropolis. Clear consensus to not keep, but all over the map on various alternatives on the delete/merge/redirect spectrum. Redirect seems like a reasonable middle ground. -- RoySmith (talk) 21:27, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dawn Metropolis

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NALBUMS, as it doesn't inherit notability from having a track as a podcast theme song. No reviews, no press. Released on an indie label. No evidence of radio rotation. MSJapan (talk) 03:37, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:44, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:44, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Whilst I agree that the album is not inherently notable, the band that released it is, so it would probably be better if it were merged into the bands page and then ""deleted"" --Joseon Empire (talk) 19:40, 03 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170e^talk 01:41, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Anamanaguchi § 2006–2009: Power Supply and Dawn Metropolis, which already has content about this album. This is a viable search term. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:57, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and the Redirect as there's nothing particularly outstanding to merge if all contenst are merged there as it is, simply delete at best since there's nothing comparably different. SwisterTwister talk 18:02, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.