- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:12, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Dazuko (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I found no notability for this software. Fails WP:N. SL93 (talk) 21:21, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:13, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- DeleteNothing in this article indicates any notable use of the software. The link in the article leading to the Dazuko project has not had any activity for 14 months and also indicates there is no-one maintaining the software code. Gtwfan52 (talk) 07:48, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Per Gtwfan52 and Unreferenced. --Chip123456 (talk) 17:37, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry the edit summary was meant to say Delete. --Chip123456 (talk) 17:39, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete; short on notability. bobrayner (talk) 18:57, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.