- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. per below, and WP:NOTNEWS. LFaraone 05:28, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Dear IRS (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Surely this cannot be notable. Delete or merge somewhere. Rd232 talk 12:25, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete a brief human interest story that was picked up by a few newspapers the day or two after it happened. Not lasting notability. --Jayron32 19:06, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:43, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Really difficult to over-estimate the under-importance of this topic.--Paul McDonald (talk) 21:14, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - The coordinated reading of a letter or a press release or a story on the radio does not make the document notable. Carrite (talk) 05:03, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.