Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Decimal superbase

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 05:36, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Decimal superbase

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Long standing unreferenced tag and search did not produce any independent usage of the term. Article title is apparently a neologism. Delete per WP notability and OR criteria. RDBury (talk) 06:07, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Zero hits on Google News, Books or Scholar indicates lack of notability, and together with lack of references suggests original research. --Qwfp (talk) 08:24, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - clearly OR. --Paul Carpenter (talk) 12:25, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, although the name is probably OR. - There's original research here, but the linguistic discussion of the short and long scales, myriads, lakh/crore, the Knuth -yllion system, seems a reasonable topic of discussion. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 07:20, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Question. Is there a suitable merge target or move target that might eliminate the neologism objection? A source that addresses these topics or similar would be helpful in assessing what to do, but I can't seem to find anything suitable (which is not to say that such sources do not exist, just that it seems to be a difficult topic on which to get useful information out of google). Sławomir Biały (talk) 20:21, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.