- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was No consensus. Johntex\talk 02:36, 22 June 2006 (UTC) ===Dee Roy=== Non-notable character that appears in a few manga chapters (will probably be less than one anime episode) and gets killed. Does not have any important personality traits and is an overall non-notable character. Ynhockey (Talk) 08:37, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I have not finished the article, which is why it does not have information. I agree that he this character plays a minor role but there are several characters in the bleach section who play even less of a role (for instance the 1st squads lieutenant). I believe wiki should have info on as many characters as possible which is why I added this character and I will continue to add new characters such as Rupee, Kuukaku, etc. -Thundercock
- Keep. Give Dee Roy a chance. David L Rattigan 10:25, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. A character that has appeared in 21 issues of a Manga comic. Should be a small paragraph in the article for the comic not an article on it's own. Peripitus (Talk) 11:14, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, not notable; mention him in Bleach (manga) or the subset for these characters, Hollow (Bleach). If someone's feeling up to it, there's probably a heck of a mass-nomination for deletion that should be done, on all the nn characters on Template:Bleach characters. Sorry, Thundercock. Proto||type 13:01, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. when i made grimmjow, shawlong, edorad and ill forte i left out d roy and nakiem for a reason...we saw little to nothing from them. no released states, none of their VERY SHORT fights were interesting, and they lack charisma. they had all of ten seconds of time, i can stretch il forte into an article but i don't think d-roy has anything worth its own article. even if i tried to stretch it i'd get a good paragraph at most, its not that wiki shouldn't have as many anime character articles as possible, it's just that d roy doesn't have enough to make an article. grimjaw 18:15, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Now that I have finished the article, it doesn't look half bad. -Thunder
- Keep. In my opinion, that was no need to make this article, but if it is already done, why not? At least we know more about him than we know about Sasakibe Chojiro (I'm not suggesting the deletion of Sasakibe's article, once we can still discover more about him... as much as Dee Roy). - Access Timeco 15:46, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: I would also nominate the Sasakibe article if there was no potential for expansion. However, who knows, he may play an important part in the story in the future. Dee Roy, on the other hand, is dead for good (in fact, completely disintegrated) so the little information that exists is all we will ever have. The current state of the article is also poor, considering it can be summarized in a couple sentences. -- Ynhockey (Talk) 16:04, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: I added something there now, maybe it's worth. But, I said in the very article, what was added is not 100% official. Well, about not having more informations about him, I wouldn't be sure. We still have Grimmjow's flashbacks and, who knows, the present! Remember that Hollows don't die (again) after being destroyed by a zanpakuto, they're puriffied and sent to Soul Society. So I think there is still a little chance we know more about Dee Roy. - Access Timeco 16:20, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: I would also nominate the Sasakibe article if there was no potential for expansion. However, who knows, he may play an important part in the story in the future. Dee Roy, on the other hand, is dead for good (in fact, completely disintegrated) so the little information that exists is all we will ever have. The current state of the article is also poor, considering it can be summarized in a couple sentences. -- Ynhockey (Talk) 16:04, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete We most likely have all the information that we are ever going to have concering this character. That information is not sufficient for an article.--Rokuwa 02:56, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep Complete description of a (very) minor character. - CNichols 04:02, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Seems like an nn minor char to me. --WinHunter (talk) 00:38, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.