Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deep: 50th Impact
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Michig (talk) 08:28, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Deep: 50th Impact (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT with no well-sourced prose. Coverage is WP:ROUTINE and article relies upon one source. LlamaAl (talk) 21:44, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:12, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:12, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:12, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No indication of notability--article is simply fight results (WP:ROUTINE).Mdtemp (talk) 20:08, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:12, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Article consists solely of fight results and the only source is a link to same. No prose and nothing to show it meets WP:SPORTSEVENT. Papaursa (talk) 20:15, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Just an ordinary sporting event without enough coverage in reliable sources. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 11:52, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.