- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete per WP:SNOW. I'm closing this one a little early. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:07, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
- Deep Adventures (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable book. Appears to fail WP:NOTBOOK. The article was created by one of the authors. reddogsix (talk) 21:22, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - Not notable and promotional. --allthefoxes (Talk) 21:26, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
- Please do not delete this page because this is a real existing book series and we have sold 2 copies and this is the way the world can know about it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Youtube0117 (talk • contribs)
- Delete - I can find no independent coverage at all. Absolutely no chance this meets WP:GNG. Article appears to be entirely promotionally motivated, and there's a clear conflict of interest with the article's author being the book's author. └ UkPaolo/talk┐ 21:29, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as unlikely notable. SwisterTwister talk 03:21, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 03:23, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.