Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deep Space Carrier

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was merge - make it so! Wait, that's Star Trek. Well, merge it anyway. Proto///type 10:27, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stub, incorrect information, cannot be wikified, unencyclopaedic, innappropriate material for merge, majority vote on discussion page Your one true god is David P. A. Hunter, esq. III ^{Talk to me!} 07:11, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as Stargate cruft. Too derivative for its own article. Tangent: Ummm, that signature is...trying to think of a word here...voluminous. Have to space down to even make this format correctly--Fuhghettaboutit 07:18, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge/redirect to Daedalus class battlecruiser. Also, is that a fair use image in that sig? If it is then it has to be removed. :P--TBCTaLk?!? 07:27, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, fancruft, redundant to Daedalus class battlecruiser. One of the editors also calls for it to be a discussion forum about the subject ("feel free to add your own opinion"), which violates WP:NOT. --Coredesat talk 07:37, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge into Daedalus class battlecruiser per the pre-existing notice on page. — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 21:28, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fancruft Artw 22:45, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fancruft. JohnnyBGood t c VIVA! 23:36, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge into Daedalus class battlecruiser per the pre-existing notice on page. RayGates 23:51, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge into Daedalus class battlecruiser. --Starionwolf 04:19, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge as discussed on the talk page. Really no point having an AfD for a page that has unanimous support for a merge of its talk page - even the original author agrees. --Tango 14:50, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I'll give voters until the end of the 4th of July, 2006 (UTC), to submit their vote. After which time, the majority will be carried out - by myself. I will merge or nom for Speedy Delete as per the vote. Your one true god is David P. A. Hunter, esq. III ^{Talk to me!} 13:00, 1 July 2006 (UTC) PS: Hope I don't forget! lol.[reply]

Let an admin close it. Non-admins should only close completely non-contraversial AfD's, as I understand it (and this one has multiple votes for different things, so it doesn't come under that description). I think the speedy delete reason that talks about things that have gone through AfD is intended for mistakes, not for non-admins to close a page an AfD as "delete" and then get someone else to actually do the deletion. --Tango 14:50, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.