- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to List of Mini-Cons. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:36, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Deep Space Team (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A poor article without sources to assert notability or even an attempt to assert notability. Dwanyewest (talk) 08:03, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:29, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to List of Mini-Cons. Mathewignash (talk) 10:42, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:12, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect for the sake of building a consensus. Shooterwalker (talk) 05:50, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.