- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Keep (NB no reasons given by nom either). Tyrenius 02:02, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This nomination was (imperfectly) started by user:Gpscholar, I'm simply fixing up Gpscholar's nomination, without comment. -- Finlay McWalter | Talk 18:54, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- In the absence of an adequate explaination from Gpscholar, one can only guess. As a nationally-known radio personality, Fernandes seems amply notable. There's reasonable citation in the article, and a cursory google confirms the hypothesis she is a real person and not a hoax or vanity addition. There's no indication that the article is a copyvio. It doesn't seem to be OR or fancruft or irrevocably biased. So we should keep it, bar a good reason not to. -- Finlay McWalter | Talk 19:00, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The article itself asserts sufficient notability. A quick google search provides sufficient information to support this article. Fluit 19:06, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, references seem to support notability claims in article. Mr. McWalter has thoughtfully left a prompt on the nominator's talk page, so maybe that will prompt further discussion or at least a starting point. Kuru talk 21:38, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.