Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deepa Shankar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Article has been improved, nominator has withdrawn, and the delete !votes have changed their opinions (i.e. WP:HEY has been met). NPASR if someone still feels that this is a page that should be deleted in order to start a fresh discussion on the live page. Primefac (talk) 09:54, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deepa Shankar

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant parts in movies, fails WP:NACTOR also no reliable secondary sources found so also fails WP:GNG Hughesdarren (talk) 01:56, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by nominator Given the massive improvements made by @DareshMohan: including a fair list of reliable independent sources, I feel that the article now meets all the notability requirements. Thankyou everyone for input, I really thought this one was a non-brainer delete. Well done DareshMohan on your work on saving it. Hughesdarren (talk) 09:30, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Admin note while you are allowed to change your mind, with this many delete !votes it cannot be withdrawn and closed unless the other participants also change their minds. Primefac (talk) 07:20, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
On that note, though, a courtesy ping @HurricaneEdgar, Robert McClenon, Deepika o, and Umakant Bhalerao is probably in order. Primefac (talk) 07:21, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete lacks of source also fails WP:Notability. HurricaneEdgar 02:13, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No references, as of 0643 GMT, 16 July. References are required for verifiability of all articles, and special requirements apply to biographies of living persons. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:45, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. Lacks sources. Deepika o (talk) 07:02, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Women, India, and Tamil Nadu. Shellwood (talk) 07:07, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: as per all of the above.-- Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 08:10, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Playing notable roles of late. The current sourcing is good and includes a BBC interview. `DareshMohan (talk)
Weak Keep, having not checked the references, but verified that there are what look like adequate references. This appears to be a Heymann case. Robert McClenon (talk) 07:34, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. In my opinion, the subject appears to satisfy WP:NACTOR. 149.36.19.74 (talk) 07:54, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per my note above. Hughesdarren (talk) 08:45, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Meet WP:GNG due to some improving the article. HurricaneEdgar 09:02, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Article expanded with more sources. Deepika o (talk) 09:17, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.