Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Def Jam Street Legend

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. copyvio and author blanked GedUK  19:53, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Def Jam Street Legend (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced speculation; fails WP:CRYSTAL. Author contested prod. I42 (talk) 20:04, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 21:35, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Well (wrote he, mostly to the article's author). The (main) problem with the article is that readers can't be, and aren't, expected to take us by our word. The word of an open wiki isn't worth much, we need something more reliable. (This isn't an idle concern, either, check the scam attempts that happened here after the tsunami - better yet, don't.)
  The article desperately needs some media outlets' or developers' statements about the game being confirmed, the official title, the roster, et cetera. Got any? --Kizor 22:07, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Per WP:CRYSTAL. Joe Chill (talk) 22:30, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete as a copyvio from http://www.hiphoplead.com/lifestyle/games/def-jam-4-street-legend/ -- Whpq (talk) 14:27, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.