- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Snowball/Speedy Delete clearly a CSD candidate, only reason it was taken to Afd was because of objection by creator but community clearly wants speedy deletion.--Jersey Devil (talk) 05:56, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Defending Nerds (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
It's essentially a blog.--Ipatrol (talk) 03:14, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete It does not even attempt to be an encyclopedia article. Steve Dufour (talk) 03:20, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- It's a signed personal manifesto, written in the first person and exhorting the reader to a single point of view, in violation of our basic Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a soapbox and Wikipedia:Neutral point of view policies. There's nothing whatsoever salveageble here. Delete. Uncle G (talk) 04:03, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Snowball delete First-person manifesto, violates WP:SOAP and WP:NPOV. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 04:08, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Snowball delete Unencyclopedic for the reasons stated above - it's a persuasive essay. HeureusementIci (talk) 04:12, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per reasons above. What I doXenocideTalk to me 04:26, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete — while I sympathize with the author's conviction to stomp out intellectual discrimination (I face a lot of adversity in regards of my intellectual "qualifications," as well.), the page is nonetheless a soapboxery style essay, not even close to being remotely encyclopedic. Also this is not your own webhost, and I would even borderline go for G11 for trying to promote a blog/YouTube channel. MuZemike (talk) 04:48, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.