Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Degrassi canon and continuity

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Anyone who wants the content for the purpose of merging can contact me. Stifle (talk) 14:45, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Degrassi canon and continuity (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

This is pure original research and completely unnecessary. TTN (talk) 21:38, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:46, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete the references provided are very weak (or in one case no longer online), and search for other supporting material covering what is canon turns up forum posts. As such, verifiability is a huge problem. -- Whpq (talk) 20:07, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LegoK^ontribsT^alkM 01:00, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Pretty standard Don't Do This OR. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 20:19, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge what can be merged. This is not a justified separate article. DGG (talk) 23:40, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge into Degrassi. Some of the article is not OR, although I cannot tell what is and what isn't. PKT 16:43, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.