- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:11, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delano Johnson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unreferenced sporting BLP stub. Salimfadhley (talk) 18:28, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:50, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:51, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. The article is sourced and a Google search shows more sources available. The more serious concern is whether the subject passes WP:NGRIDIRON, not having played a professional game. • Gene93k (talk) 20:02, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
KeepLame article, needs lots of work. Subject passes WP:GNG through multiple independent reliable sources.--Paul McDonald (talk) 02:27, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Paul, you need to do some in-depth homework and provide more critical analysis for this AfD. A Google News Archive search ("Delano Johnson" Bowie State) reveals a total of TWENTY-SEVEN results (see [1]), virtually all of which are fanblogs, sources affiliated with the Bowie State football program, or are simple routine mentions in post-game coverage. I found precisely one piece of in-depth coverage in an independent source (Yahoo Sports), and it's a blog (see [2]). That's pretty slender thread on which to hang GNG notability. If there is other quality, in-depth coverage to be found in independent sources, please provide links. Thanks. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 22:10, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Response funny I get 357 a lot of which are news articles but whatever, I'm sure they're not all about this subject.--Paul McDonald (talk) 01:34, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Checking through the first several pages of results, almost none are about this subject. cmadler (talk) 18:51, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Trying to be fair to Paul, I just went through the first ten pages of his Google search linked above. Here are the results: 106 - not the same person; 9 - trivial mention and/or routine game/recruiting coverage; 5 - fansite or team blog; 2 - non-independent Bowie State sources. Of the 122 hits reviewed, not one of them qualifies as a meaningful source for purposes of establishing notability per WP:GNG. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 17:36, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Ooops that's all I got... thanks for the research!--Paul McDonald (talk) 04:22, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Trying to be fair to Paul, I just went through the first ten pages of his Google search linked above. Here are the results: 106 - not the same person; 9 - trivial mention and/or routine game/recruiting coverage; 5 - fansite or team blog; 2 - non-independent Bowie State sources. Of the 122 hits reviewed, not one of them qualifies as a meaningful source for purposes of establishing notability per WP:GNG. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 17:36, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Checking through the first several pages of results, almost none are about this subject. cmadler (talk) 18:51, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Response funny I get 357 a lot of which are news articles but whatever, I'm sure they're not all about this subject.--Paul McDonald (talk) 01:34, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Very few sources, and none sufficient to establish notability for our purposes. cmadler (talk) 18:51, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Per Cmadler and my comments above. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 17:36, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.