Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delaware survivor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh 03:12, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delaware survivor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

• Delete. Notability not established, seems no more than a local weblog. References do not relate to subject of article. WWGB (talk) 10:54, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• KEEP. This page is about a reputable show, that has a massive nationwide fan base. There are numerous websites and fan pages about this tv show. The notability is how a local show managed to go nationwide with the help of the ezBoard community. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lax8912 (talk • contribs)
• KEEP. I simply googled the show and found numerous websites proving validity. I think this should have been posted, since this is all that got the article about SURVIVOR SUCKS message board posted: http://p071.ezboard.com/bthesurvivorlounge —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.138.81.168 (talk • contribs)
• Delete. If it is indeed a show with a "massive nationwide fan base", surely it must have received some coverage in independent reliable sources, such as major newspapers or magazines. The references currently listed in the article either don't mention the show at all, or are just random blogs. Hqb (talk) 12:47, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Almost all the ghits for "Delaware Survivor" relate to an educational children's book of that name. I see only a lone blog reference. "DE Survivor" turns up mainly Spanish sites mentioning something or else "of Survivor". If this is a Web-based "show", it's borderline speediable per A7; in any event, it fails WP:V and WP:RS. Deor (talk) 12:57, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - no reliable sources -- Whpq (talk) 17:35, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.