- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 00:38, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- DeliPlayer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Not notable, doesn't claim to be notable, no references Miami33139 (talk) 00:51, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No claim made for notability, no 3rd party sources. LK (talk) 20:19, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep. Defunct software, but worth documenting for historical record. LotLE×talk 22:37, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Please base that statement on our notability criteria, not personal feelings. Without references, there is no historical record. Miami33139 (talk) 22:58, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:09, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete- seems to be fairly run-of-the-mill software with no notability either asserted or demonstrated. We are not a directory of every bit of software ever written. Reyk YO! 06:32, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails the notability guidelines. Themfromspace (talk) 01:30, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.