Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delirium Records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 03:33, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delirium Records

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Delirium Records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced since 2010. I can't find any reliable sources. – yutsi (talk) 02:55, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. – yutsi (talk) 02:55, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and California. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:11, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete doesn't meet WP:MUSIC's sense of an importand indie label; a label with no notable artists (Discogs lists only 13 releases total, none from culturally significant acts). Chubbles (talk) 15:29, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per reply above. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 00:49, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom and Chubbles. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 01:11, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.