- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 11:02, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Subject of article does not meet guidelines for notability per WP:MUSIC Nv8200p talk 16:11, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no evidence of notability per WP:BAND; only external links are to their own site and MySpace. No external reviews or coverage. Walton monarchist89 16:21, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Two self-released EPs, no apparent third-party coverage. Fails WP:BAND. ShadowHalo 16:31, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep if sourced 'the track reached number 14 in the charts.' along with touring claims are more than enough to meet WP:MUSIC if confirmed before the end of the debate. Nuttah68 09:22, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete. The creater of the article was User:Delorentos, so there's clearly a WP:COI issue. That being said, there does appear to be some independant coverage[1] [2]. If someone not associated with the band wanted to clean it up and source it, I could support keeping it.--Kubigula (talk) 20:24, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.