Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delta Iota Epsilon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fabrictramp (talk) 00:13, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delta Iota Epsilon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Recreated after a couple of speedy deletions, this fraternity exists only at one college, has 57 Google hits, many of which are false returns. Phlegm Rooster (talk) 20:07, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - no indication of notability. JohnCD (talk) 20:43, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - as per JohnCD. Napsterbater (talk) 21:00, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as previously deleted and still nn. MSJapan (talk) 21:02, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete the article does not assert notability except in reference to other fraternities, which are a subset of social organizations. Thus, the claim that their social organization is different in that it is based on friendship and acceptance is not notable. Lazulilasher (talk) 22:06, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. As someone who didn't go to university in the USA I really don't get the whole point of this "fraternity" stuff. What the idea? Is it just that a few guys who lack the social skills to get girlfriends choose a few random Greek letters to try to make themselves look important? That's how it looks to me. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:49, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Procedurally extend AfD for 2 days, 14 hours, and 8 minutes to 10:15, 22 May 2008 due to AfD notice being removed on 14:16, 15 May 2008 by 65.246.68.2 and restored on 02:24, 18 May 2008 by Davidwr. Keep an eye on the article folks, make sure the AfD notice doesn't get taken down again. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 02:39, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete geesh this thing should've been SPEEDIED for lack of a reference. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 02:39, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • It never occured to me to check if the frat was university-approved, good catch. Phlegm Rooster (talk) 17:59, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• COMMENT The 2 prior deletions were from this month, so temporarily WP:SALT for 30 days to prevent re-creation. Oh, and people, keep this in your watch-list through the beginning of the fall semester. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 02:43, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.