- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was nomination withdrawn. Clearly I was using the wrong search engine. Bmusician 07:04, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delta Rae (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This band may become notable in the future, but for now, it fails WP:BAND and WP:GNG because of the lack of coverage in reliable sources. Bmusician 10:36, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Coverage received thus far is more than adequate for notability. In addition to the coverage cited in the article there's also these: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. --Michig (talk) 14:39, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: The band is already notable. SL93 (talk) 16:51, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:02, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.