Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deltron Event II (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Deltron 3030. Shimeru (talk) 07:44, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deltron Event II

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Result of first nomination in 2008 was keep due to sources saying that the album would be out soon. But now, even after being in the works at least six years, there is still no confirmed release date. Most recent source in the article says release will be in "2010" but given the project's history that's not too believable and is not verifiable to the necessary level of detail. WP:CRYSTAL is still the overriding issue for this album as it s was in 2008. DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 19:36, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. —DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 19:38, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note - just learned that the article was also PROD'ded in July 2009 for the same reason and the PROD was removed by an editor, once again because sources said at the time that the album would be out "soon." It appears that nobody followed up on that PROD removal. DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 19:42, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per WP:CRYSTAL.--137.122.49.102 (talk) 19:51, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Deltron 3030. Information on this album has slowed to a trickle — not even Del's own newsletter has mentioned it — and no reliable sources have written about it in over a year. White 720 (talk) 23:11, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment from Nominator - I think the merge suggested by White 720 (plus a redirect) is a pretty good idea. Even though the album might never see the light of day, its production is probably a matter of historical interest for the supergroup project. --DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 23:32, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect as per White 720.--Pink Bull 01:16, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 05:51, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Another Comment from Nominator - I'm willing to accept merge/redirect as the "consensus" if nobody else comes along with a strong argument to delete. --DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 21:04, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.