- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 00:03, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Demand Progress (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Nonnotable grassroots movement. Single-source text. The existing thrid-party refs are about thrd-party things and NOT about this org. Staszek Lem (talk) 00:12, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 15:27, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 15:27, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 15:27, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Lacks significant coverage in reliable independent sources, fails WP:GNG & WP:ORG.--JayJasper (talk) 19:35, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, subject appears to fail notability as outlined by WP:GNG & WP:ORG.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 19:01, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.