- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Zoids. MBisanz talk 03:43, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Demantis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This fictional weapon does not establish notability independent of Zoids through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of original research, trivial model details, and unnecessary plot details. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, and this is too trivial to require any separate coverage. TTN (talk) 21:45, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Zoids as a plausible search term. Otherwise, this is nothing but unverifiable original research (note: I will be copy-and-pasting this on the related AFDs as well, as the exact same rationale applies). MuZemike (talk) 22:41, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as above per nom. Eusebeus (talk) 23:37, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect as plausible search term and merge if any verification can be done. No independent notability doesn't mean its not notable at all (it can be notable in the context of the fictional universe). - Mgm|(talk) 23:45, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Does not establish notability through significant coverage of real world context in reliable secondary sources independent of the subject. Jay32183 (talk) 09:05, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.