- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 06:51, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Demergence (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable neologism WuhWuzDat 13:40, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unsourced neologism that I'm not seeing very much use or coverage for at all. Gigs (talk) 13:54, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 10:46, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. —GRBerry 14:47, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I couldn't find any good sources to explain this concept. --Explodicle (T/C) 15:15, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Some Scholar hits, but they seem to be about science rather than philosophy. --Cybercobra (talk) 23:06, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.