- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete --JForget 22:51, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Demotariat (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable protologism. Only Ghits are two blogs (one with no content) and the creator's Wikipedia userpage. nneonneo talk 19:54, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. 10 Google hits? That is even less notable than me! ;-) --DanielRigal (talk) 19:58, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Fails WP:RS and WP:N. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 21:58, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails WP:V; I have not been able to source the content. BlueValour (talk) 22:43, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, WP:NEO or WP:MADEUP. KleenupKrew (talk) 02:14, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and very obviously so --self-invented word with no sources and no attempt to assert any, a good case for SNOW.DGG (talk) 03:15, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I agree with the previous observations. This article does not seem salvageable. AltioraPeto (talk) 18:43, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.