- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Cirt (talk) 01:37, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Denis d'or (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
What is this, someone's homework. This article is rambling, without citation and looks like a precis of an essay someone wrote for school. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.200.107.179 (talk) 13:08, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: I'm just the messenger, the rationale above was given for the AFD, I'm just completing creation of it. tedder (talk) 15:57, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. If accurate, this would definitely be notable. I agree, there's a lot of cleanup to do, and we'll need references - but I think the subject is (or has the potential to be) notable. UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 18:57, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep It has an entry in Grove Music Online, which says that it "was the first musical instrument to involve electricity, though this was probably not an essential part of its action". Article could use some additional sources and a copyedit, but it's not irredeemably bad. Zagalejo^^^ 19:46, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The Google Books search linked above shows obvious notability. Phil Bridger (talk) 14:05, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.