Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denma

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:53, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Denma

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability. There's an assertion of notability here which is why I'm not speeding it, but there are no independent refs to back the assertion & a quick furtle about the Web does not bring up anything. TheLongTone (talk) 14:45, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Webcomics-related deletion discussions. sst ✈ ^(top/_bottom) 15:01, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. sst ✈ ^(top/_bottom) 15:01, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. sst ✈ ^(top/_bottom) 15:01, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I'm unsure if this should be kept or not but I was able to track down sources fairly quickly when I looked it up on google. Heres a long online article talking about the series coming back from it's hiatus: http://www.nocutnews.co.kr/news/4369080 . And here is some sort of blog type post about how either the comic or just characters from it are going to be in an online game: http://www.thisisgame.com/webzine/news/rboard/1/?n=65241 . I found a few other sources I was confident were not blogs but they are entertainment specific so I can't really tell how popular the comic is. Peachywink (talk) 18:31, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
weak keep might be more solid sources, but the nocutnews one looks fine (or so says my Google-translate-based reading. Hobit (talk) 06:02, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:29, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:11, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.