Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Depolarization radiation force theory

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Mindmatrix 18:29, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In view my article "Deprolarization radiation force theory" does not meet the wikipedia.org's policy, I ask my article to be deleted promptly. The author jxzj. 2006-12-04.

This article's claims (esp. claims, since deleted, in Gravitation) are so outlandish that I thought it necessary to follow them up. The creator's name, User:Jxzj, matches the initials of the first author of the cited papers, so it's likely she's the same person. That's why I called it a vanity edit. The cited papers do exist on cite-base[1], but their only citations seem to be among themselves. The authors have also published several books, through Nova Science Publishers. The books are listed by numerous booksellers and a few (gullible) university libraries, but have not otherwise been cited or reviewed, as far as I can find.

The authors maintain a fantasy website at [2] Eleuther 02:09, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Err, this nom is incomplete, but I've marked the article under CSD A1 seeing as it has no content. --Wafulz 02:00, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Okay nom is complete now. Remember to stay civil, no matter how ridiculous/vain you think an entry may be. --Wafulz 02:41, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks for the admonishment. I was too impolite. Eleuther 03:01, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. Borderline speedy. MER-C 05:08, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. Should be a speedy, since the article has no content apart from attempts to direct readers to external links. Shimeru 06:13, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• 'Delete not speedy, I want to see what the author has to say. I will check to see if anyone has left anything on her talk page. ---*- u:Chazz/contact/t: 15:15, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per MER-C, appears to be linkspam. - SpLoT _{(*T* C+u+g+v)} 16:28, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete G7 based on the author's comment at the top of this AfD, and A3 due to containing nothing but external references. Tagged as such. --ais523 09:50, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.