Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dermacleanse

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 06:25, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dermacleanse

Article about a skin cream invented in a class project. Not quite promotional enough for a speedy WP:CSD#G11 as advertising, but certainly not notable enough for an encyclopedia article. Wikipedia is not for things made up one day in school. Contested PROD. Delete. JohnCD (talk) 11:09, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nominator as fails notability. Sadly I can't think of a speedy other than an WP:IAR deletion. Whilst it appears there is a product called Derma Cleanse on the market this is clearly not it. A google search for "Lyons and Kerry Company" returns exactly nothing. M♠ssing Ace 11:12, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article author is Tom lyons (talk · contribs): I think "Lyons and Kerry Company" is two lads in a biology class at Dulwich College, a London secondary school. JohnCD (talk) 12:34, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Blatantly unverifiable. - Mgm|^(talk) 11:30, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per others, I can't find any verfiable information on this product or the company involved. This further shows a flaw of CSD, because we need a way to filter out this trash quicker than AfD and PROD. —Cyclonenim (talk · contribs · email) 12:08, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:MADEUP. I agree with Cyclonenim - I've long said that A7 needs to cover things like made-up words, sacred pairs of pants, hamsters, comic books drawn by 4th graders, and other clearly non-notable things that aren't people or organizations. Graymornings_(talk) 21:37, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete! - This may not fall under A7, but it certainly falls under db-nocontext and db-spam, IMO. --Alinnisawest,^{Dalek Empress} (extermination requests here) 03:37, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.