- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 07:25, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Derrer Michael (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Cliff Smith 17:00, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Appears to be a successful consultant but still does not meet the requirements of WP:BIO. All the links provided in the article are either semi-relevant links to the German Wikipedia or links to webpages that are more or less controlled by Derrer himself. Not so surprisingly, the article reads like a LinkedIn profile and I have failed to find in-depth coverage in reliable third-party sources that could serve as a basis for a full article. I would also note that the username suggests that the article was created by someone working for Derrer's consulting firm. Pichpich (talk) 16:59, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:42, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:42, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:43, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Does not contain citations of the third-party coverage required for passing WP:BIO and does not meet the requirements of WP:POLITICIAN. Sandstein 08:14, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 17:50, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Somewhat surprising that this wasn't BLPProd'ed. Also, the formatting suggests a WP:COPYVIO. -- BenTels (talk) 18:15, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- In cases like these where the article has many sources but that I deem unreliable, I prefer to give the article creator a forum to defend his sources. Pichpich (talk) 23:05, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails WP:POLITICIAN. Location (talk) 03:58, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.