Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Desk Rabbit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 07:41, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Non-encyclopedic, just a one-off joke from a TV show. Arteitle 05:50, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Agreed as above.Wickethewok 05:54, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:NEO. dbtfz^talk 05:55, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, nn neologism from a TV show (without elaborate explanation). Royboycrashfan 06:12, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Yet another article about a TV-created neologism that people will forget once the next one comes around. --Kinu ^t/_c 07:29, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - all of the above --hooverbag 09:09, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as above. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 10:00, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. ¡Dustimagic! ^(T/C) 19:30, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete see above Jakemcmahon 21:41, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as above. violet/riga (t) 21:51, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Neologism. Heck, even Moss said he made it up and doesn't know what it means. --Mayrel 22:38, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Do not Delete - Merge with IT Crowd article - no need for absolute deletion rglc (t) 21:51, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.