- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 03:20, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Desktop Budget (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Can't find any google news results of WP:RS. Nothing else obvious. No indication of notability in article. Shadowjams (talk) 07:13, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No indication of notability. Postoak (talk) 07:23, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as software that does not establish notability, nor does give reliable sources. The author of the article claims that "the freeware version of Desktop Budget has been reviewed and talked about by several bloggers", but the only links to one review by a blog writer. This should not even be considered a reliable source per the third notability guideline of web content, "The content is distributed via a medium which is both respected and independent of the creators, either through an online newspaper or magazine, an online publisher, or an online broadcaster; except for trivial distribution including content being hosted on sites without editorial oversight (such as YouTube, MySpace, GeoCities, Newgrounds, personal blogs, etc.)." The only other links given are the official website and a second link to the same review. In conclusion, the article describes non-notable software, and should be deleted under the web content notability guidelines. NnCv2 12:03, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.