Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Desktop Scientific

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Author requested deletion via page-blanking; I have duly deleted the page. TFOWR 08:47, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Desktop Scientific

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There does not appear to be any third-party sources indicating notability of this company. The article's references do not appear to provide any support of notability either. With the conflict of interest evident with the article's creator, this seems to be merely promotional. Peacock (talk) 17:07, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Does seem to read as promotional. No real establishment of secondary sourcing either. As the article stands currrently fails WP:ORG Ottawa4ever (talk) 18:14, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete few if any 3rd party references in appropriate publications to establish notability.--Torchwood Who? (talk) 23:10, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:52, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:52, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It's ad copy; sources are not much help. Şłџğģő 07:53, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The aforementioned creator now is asking how to delete the whole thing: [1] Şłџğģő 07:58, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not many 3rd party refs available, seems to be non-notable. T (Formerly Known as FireSpike) 07:54, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Please delete the article, just got a better source and quotation from Encyclopaedia Britannica The only Internet Resource about Statistics Recommended by Encyclopaedia Britannica.

As an employee in charge of these operations, I am hereby ordering you to remove this article.

Thanks

Kyle —Preceding unsigned comment added by KyleAraujo (talk • contribs) 08:11, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And I guess we can consider that a delete vote, straight from the article's creator. Şłџğģő 08:34, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Ad-like and no references. I've got to admit though: Kyle's above comment gave me a chuckle or two. ;) --Mithrandir^∞ (Talk!) (Opus Operis) 08:17, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The article creator wanted it deleted, so I asked him to blank the page, whereupon I slapped a db-g7 speedy on it, which moots this section. Jusdafax 08:37, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, now how do I remove myself from wikipedia? disabled account? —Preceding unsigned comment added by KyleAraujo (talk • contribs) 08:39, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There's a request I have not seen before. I don't know the answer, I'm afraid. Perhaps someone here does, or you could ask... possibly at the "Help desk". Jusdafax 08:43, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:VANISH, although "user in good standing" might be iffy. Also, that's a rather overcomplicated process. Şłџğģő 08:47, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.