Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Determination puzzle
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Logic puzzle. For Psinu's suggestion, there doesn't seem to be a sufficient reason to split off Category:Logic puzzles, and at any rate that's a decision outside the scope of this discussion. –Pomte 02:17, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Determination puzzle (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
No reliable sources. Maybe redirect to Logic puzzle, but AFAICT the term was taken from Nurikabes lead and given a broader meaning here, but is not used widely. -- /home/dalric/talk 10:28, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Logic puzzle as suggested CultureDrone (talk) 11:19, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect as suggested or, if this is a valid suggestion, Make a Category. Looks possibly useful as a grouping, but not an item in and of itself. (If someone could weigh in on if "Make a Category" is a valid response, I'd appreciate it... still learning here!) ΨνPsinu 13:34, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Both your suggestions are perfectly valid on an AfD. EconomicsGuy (talk) 13:40, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect per nom. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 17:58, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect per nom, seems like a duplicate term.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 13:14, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.