- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. With the move, I think there is now consensus to keep. DGG (talk) 23:48, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Detpak (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
The article was a bit spammy and tagged for speedy deletion as spam. I've tried to de-spamify. Some of the products this company produces are familiar to a large number of consumers, so there's at least an argument for notability. - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 18:18, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Nice job despamming. I still don't see much notability, nor does it look like it will get any better. I found it very difficult to find a source that wasn't Detpak or someone who sells there product. I think they sponsor a barista competition. Dethlock99 (talk) 17:33, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. -- - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 19:38, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 19:39, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Detpak is a subsidiary of Detmold. Normally I'd recommend a merge bit there's nothing to merge to. -- Whpq (talk) 16:56, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Moved and cited I moved it to Detmold per Whpq's comment and added a citation. Keep Notable. ChildofMidnight (talk) 17:45, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm okay with a Detmold article. Detmold has articles written about it. Thanks to ChildofMidnight for doing teh editting. -- Whpq (talk) 18:45, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.