Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Detroit Shootings in 2004

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sango123 17:38, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why does a log of shootings for 8 months in Detroit deserve to be an article? Metros232 03:14, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, not an article at all... Michael 07:32, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete listcruft. —EdGl 03:33, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete listcruft (800 shootings? Strewth!) SM247^{My Talk} 04:16, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete when I saw the title, I was expecting a list of murders, crimes, etc. I wasn't expecting something that belongs in a police log. Not encylopedic. Yanksox 04:21, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete This is a log, not an article. joturner 05:04, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 06:06, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, indiscriminate list. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-07-02 09:06Z
• Delete, information is in useless format. KarenAnn 11:24, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, indiscriminate list. -- Alias Flood 17:09, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, its not encyclopedic. Not even an article. --Tachyon01 18:07, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. Zos 23:08, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, listcruft. Royalbroil 04:12, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.