- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete J.delanoygabsadds 03:32, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Devall (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable investment company, fails WP:CORP. No coverage in third-party sources, zero ghits for Devall Investment Group. SheepNotGoats (Talk) 20:37, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete as blatant spam of a non-notable company. Theseeker4 (talk) 20:42, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Unsourced article, little or evidence of notability. On the borderline of being promotional, but it definitely reads like it was written by a representative of the company itself. ~ mazca t|c 22:52, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for lack of notability. Unusual? Quite TalkQu 22:53, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete (G11) — Spamming. MuZemike (talk) 01:15, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 05:29, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.