Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Developmental abnormality
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect. Sprinting faster (talk) 15:24, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Developmental abnormality (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This would need to be deleted unless it is expanded an awful lot; the subject is OK but the article just needs expansion... Otherwise it is pointless. RcsprinterGimme a message 15:11, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:37, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- That's not a reason for deletion. See WP:BEFORE. -Atmoz (talk) 17:36, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Neutral If the article can be expanded it will make for excellent reading but in its current state, it hardly offers any insight into the topic save the pictures on display. I will inform the author about my suggestion. CrossTempleJay talk 22:18, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Congenital abnormality. Boghog (talk) 18:45, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge (if there is anything salvageable) and redirect as per Boghog. - UtherSRG (talk) 18:59, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Anybody who supports this can contact my on my talk page when/if we have consensus on this. We can work to find anything worth merging and do it. RcsprinterGimme a message 07:26, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]