- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 20:57, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Devil's Colonic (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable new cocktail made up one day (May 2, to be precise). Not surprisingly, a search finds nothing relevant to suggest notability. Fails WP:V, WP:N, WP:NFT. Contested PROD. Delete. JohnCD (talk) 18:56, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete WP:MADEUP Drawn Some (talk) 18:59, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Drmies (talk) 19:04, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- From Poster I apologize, this was only meant for use as a reference. Everything at some point is made up, I didn't realize mixed drinks require sources. I fully understand policies and if you feel this isn't appropriate that's your call. I only wished to post it as a reference, again I apologize for the inconvenience. My intent wasn't to make something up, for the sake of making it up or to gain credit, simply as a reference. Ironic, you need a reference to make a reference. Again, I completely understand the policy but I hope that at least the information under "Duo and trio cocktails" may be allowed to stay. Thank you for your time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Iampatyouarenot (talk • contribs) 19:10, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Wikipedia is not a reliable third party source. So if you were trying to use the fact that this drink had a wikipedia article in another wikipedia article as notable, that cannot be done. Also note that every article needs to have reliable, verifiable third party sources. Obviously there are articles that don't have them, but thats why we have this process. Livewireo (talk) 21:36, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, WP:NFT. NawlinWiki (talk) 04:16, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.