- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --Coredesat 04:25, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Doesn't pass WP:PORNBIO. Epbr123 14:43, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I believe the article does infact follow the guidelines of the Wiki porn-bio.
This performer has won or been a serious nominee for a well-known award, such as those listed in Category:Adult movie awards or Category:Film awards or from a major pornographic magazine, such as Penthouse, Playboy, or Playgirl, as well as their counterparts in other pornography genres. Devilz Candy has been featured in Juggs magazine(which is pretty major, everyone knows Juggs), and other BBW interest magazines.
Performer has made unique contributions to a pornographic film genre. Yes, with her unique work in her genre. She also is a pioneer in actresses relationships with fans, doing alot of stuff that other actresses never have
Is the performer noted for beginning a trend in pornography? Yes she is a legendary BBW actress.
Did the performer star in an iconic, groundbreaking or blockbuster feature? She is an icon in the BBW world, and her style is considered groundbreaking, in BBW and mainstream porn.
Performer has been prolific or innovative within a specific genre niche. Yes BBW
Performer has been the participant in a significant event or controversy reported by credible news media. Since its opening the Red Rooster(where she is an employee) has been a very controversial place, and has been featured in Vegas news.
Performer meets other notability grounds not connected to being involved in porn. Yes her conventions, and fuctions, along with her work at the Red Rooster.
This article clearly meets wiki criteria, and should not be deleted.--Lucius Sempronius Turpio 03:57, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Appearing in Juggs magazine isn't an award. There's no evidence that she's a "legendary" BBW actress or that her her style is considered "groundbreaking". There are many BBW models who are more prolific than her. Epbr123 08:04, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Unless, of course, we want to use the word "groundbreaking" in a horribly lame and unkind weight-related pun. --Agamemnon2 11:29, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Funny Agamemnon2, but seriously her interaction with fans is also what makes her so unique. She will use objects that fans send in which is something she brings to the table. Virtually no other porn star do that. She also hangs out with them at the Red Rooster in Las Vegas, and socializes, signs autographs, and takes pictures. She does have a huge fan base, and that is another reason this article should stay.--Lucius Sempronius Turpio 23:15, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- If Devilz Candy's contributions are exceptional as stated above, surely they must have earned some verifiable recognition within the BBW niche or there must be some published reliable source that has noted them. Otherwise, Devilz Candy is not notable per WP:PORNBIO. • Gene93k 20:16, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It would just be a shame if this noteable actress' article was deleted. I have clearly explained valid reasons on why the article should remain on Wikipedia, so now its out of my hands. --Lucius Sempronius Turpio 03:29, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The case for notability is neither compelling nor supported by reliable sources. I cannot accept a mention in Juggs magazine (whether or not "everyone knows Juggs") as a notable commendation. -- Rob C. alias Alarob 22:15, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.