- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mkativerata (talk) 23:08, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Devplayer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Self-promotional article on a non-notable piece of software; no independent coverage in sources, no signs of notability. Created by obviously self-promotional single-purpose account (Meetthedev (talk · contribs)). Earlier PROD was removed by article creator. Fut.Perf. ☼ 18:35, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not finding non-trivial coverage in any reliable 3rd party sources. Qrsdogg (talk) 18:43, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no reliable sources found - DeVerm (talk) 18:44, 15 July 2011 (UTC).[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — —Tom Morris (talk) 19:17, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Search results included only places to download the application and forums discussions. There appear to be no reviews or sources covering this software in-depth. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 18:28, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.