- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:00, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
- Devvon Terrell (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
COntested PROD. Reason was "It is not simply having references that allows an article to remain here. The article must also show the subject's notability, and this one does not. Currently fails WP:GNG." Fiddle Faddle 10:42, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
- I have updated and i am continuing to update the page with very reputable references. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BraggadocioMusicPub (talk • contribs) 11:29, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:24, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:24, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Promotional material created by affiliated entity (now blocked). JohnInDC (talk) 16:03, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
- Delete — A catalogue of the artist's biography and discography is not enough to establish notability; there is insufficient media coverage to meet WP:NMUSIC. hmssolent\You rang? ship's log 02:26, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.