- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the nomination was delete. Mackensen (talk) 02:59, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Another porn star "article" -- with a bad-taste photo too. *sigh*. I'm not a puritan, but if you are going to write up articles on specific porn stars, then they better pass the Wikipedia:Notability (people) test and the article has to at least resemble a biography of some sort. -- Netsnipe CVU (Talk) 19:05, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, notable enough (google search[1]) Wikipedia is not censored for children. In my humble much less revealing than this Rex Chandler and likely more notable, you are right could use a cleanup but the photo is not that offensive.--John Lake 19:17, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Proposed guideline WP:PORN BIO specifically warns against google tests for this kind of subject due to the adult industry practice of google bombing Bwithh 20:48, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: I know that Wikipedia isn't censored for children. In fact I wouldn't object to the Rex Chandler article at all that you've cited as an example because unlike the two I've nominated so far, it actually reads like a biography and links to a IMDB Page. This article on the other hand is uninformative and is thinly disguised link-spam. -- Netsnipe CVU (Talk) 19:27, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, I don't object to the Rex Chandler article at all just saying the Devine image is much less revealing that the one in the Chandler article by a long shot. The Devine image is just an image of a rather well endowed lady.--John Lake 19:41, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep,The Photo can be changed or replace. But all the information is true and accurate. User:LMPjr007
- The issue of this article's deletion is not over factuality, but notability. Yanksox 19:38, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, fails WP:BIO. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 20:43, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails WP:BIO, as well as proposed guideline WP:PORN BIO. Bwithh 20:48, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete bust size ≠ notabilty. ~ trialsanderrors 20:50, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Not that I'm claiming bust size = notability in this case, but it could. If one can have a WP article simply for being among the tallest people in the world, then I'd imagine the person with the largest breasts in the world could have an article simply for that reason. -- Kicking222 23:03, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Superlatives are not policy, WP:V is. ~ trialsanderrors 00:11, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Not that I'm claiming bust size = notability in this case, but it could. If one can have a WP article simply for being among the tallest people in the world, then I'd imagine the person with the largest breasts in the world could have an article simply for that reason. -- Kicking222 23:03, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails to meet relevant guidelines and lack of verifiable evidence. Judging from her Google hits, she is talented at self-promotion with her Yahoo group and myspace page on the first page of hits. However, there is a distinct lack of verifiable material from third-party sources. Capitalistroadster 20:56, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
KeepBased on the information listed here http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendID=38716995&blogID=134388814&MyToken=afaa3621-42d9-4b21-a854-10f4de50ca7a and here http://www.herecomesjohn.com plus his direct relation to Howard Stern would make her bio acceptable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LMPjr007 (talk • contribs)- Comment Please "vote" only once. I've struck out your second "keep". Also, MySpace isn't a reliable source. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 05:53, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: fails WP:PORN_BIO, which is only a proposed guideline but is very sensible in my opinion. –Dicty (T/C) 21:11, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
KeepThey why is Ron Jemery about to be kept? Or any porn star?User:LMPjr007
- LMPjr007,Please see WP:BIO and WP:PORN BIO, as already previously mentioned above. Bwithh 22:33, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I've struck out your third "keep". This is not a vote, but please don't argument-stack. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 05:53, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:PORN BIO GassyGuy 22:37, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep She's been on the Howard Stern Show multiple times. I've actually heard of her, which is very rare for such an "actress". I think this article could be expanded. -- Kicking222 23:02, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for failing WP:BIO --WinHunter (talk) 02:57, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, non-notable porn star. --Terence Ong (Chat | Contribs) 04:41, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails WP:PORN BIO -- GWO
- Keep passes WP:PORN BIO #7 Performer has appeared multiple times in notable mainstream media outlets (the Air Force Amy rule) - by being on the Howard Stern show. Royalbroil 05:19, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.