Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dhaka Regency

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No significant and notable coverage, does not meet WP:GNG. Nakon 02:33, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dhaka Regency

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Created by a single edit user. Looks like an advert . One of the 2 sources is trip advisor. Hardly a reliable source. LibStar (talk) 13:51, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete - Not really sure what policy is most appropriate for hotels, but agree with nom, that referencing on this article is poor and creation was suspicious. NickCT (talk) 14:11, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - does not pass WP:GNG —Мандичка^YO 😜 17:47, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:30, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:30, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:30, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep, few references is included. Ibrahim Husain Meraj (talk) 05:51, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

the 2 sources added are hardly indepth, in fact just promotional mentions for the hotel. [1], and [2]. LibStar (talk) 06:48, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, it's definitely not a run-of-the-mill hotel and it's been mentioned many times in the news. I agree it's not always specifically covered, but it's definitely more notable in respect to all the other 10000 hotels in Bangladesh. The number of high-class hotels in Bangladesh are limited, which I why I think it's best to do cover them in wikipedia. Some of the more direct mentions are listed below. Dhaka Regency has also been used for conventions sometimes it seems (second ref).

Sayeda Akter (11 April 2008). "Local chefs come to the fore". The Daily Star. Retrieved 18 May 2015.
Sayeda Akter (22 March 2012). "Japan garment buyers keen on Bangladesh". The Daily Star. Retrieved 18 May 2015.
Suman Saha (23 December 2014). "Luxury hotels eye better Christmas sales". The Daily Star. Retrieved 18 May 2015.
Sujay Mahajan (7 February 2015). ""Guest-draught" at luxury hotels". Prothom Alo. Retrieved 18 May 2015.
Kailash Sarkar (29 April 2015). "Police nabs 5 directors of Dhaka Regency Hotel". Dhaka Tribune. Retrieved 18 May 2015.

This should be enough to account for notability. Please always remember that the quality or depth of the current article doesn't matter! – Nahiyan8 (talk | contribs) 02:12, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:34, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 00:43, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List of hotels in Bangladesh#Dhaka as the hotel has not received significant and notable coverage with News, a few Books and several Highbeam but mostly for tour guides, events or "come visit!" and nothing as in-depth as it could be. I was going to say delete but now a redirect would be good and save the article for future use. SwisterTwister talk 05:12, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@SwisterTwister: Sometimes the problem is that reviews that do go into detail are sometimes treated as unreliable sources... but atleast the hotel is much more acknowledged than the others, of which 5 I can name in Cox's Bazaar (which should actually have more articles). – Nahiyan8 (talk | contribs) 04:51, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@SwisterTwister: Also, I just realised that a redirect here is equivalent to a delete, hmm! – Nahiyan8 (talk | contribs) 04:54, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This hotel one of the closest to the airport in Dhaka, one of the few upscale ones. It was founded by British-Bangladeshi as an investment and was hailed as a model for dual national Bangladeshi investment. Type Dhaka R in google.com the second suggestion is Dhaka Regency and in google.com.bd the first sugesstion is Dhaka Regency. It regularly holds events that encourage family participation which is rare in Bangladesh. Musleh Ahmed, vice president of the Dhaka Regency hotel, has been honoured as the best NRB investor at the British Bangladeshi Business Award held in Birmingham, UK. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 04:50, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Dhaka R in google.com the second suggestion is Dhaka Regency and in google.com.bd the first sugesstion is Dhaka Regency." is not an argument at all to advcance notability. LibStar (talk) 04:57, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.