- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:09, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Dhapodkar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable, very little context, probably fails WP:BIO if it falls under that. Sable232 (talk) 21:24, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —SpacemanSpiff (talk) 05:41, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: No refs, orphaned article. Unless there can be some reasonalbe proof that the Surname is ised by a significant number of persons, its best ot delete. --Deepak D'Souza 08:35, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | Talk 00:09, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete NN name, not a disambiguation page either. -SpacemanSpiff (talk) 18:47, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.