Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dhruva software

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:50, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dhruva software

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Dhruva software (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Google News turns up only one hit, and that one appears to be something like a press release ("Yourstory.com"). Not enough evidence of notability. A loose necktie (talk) 14:00, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:32, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:32, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete A search on all available platforms has led to minimal results. The one source found does not assert notability and as a result, the article fails WP:NSOFT. AmericanAir88^(talk) 16:45, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Has no sources and does not make any claims for the company's importance or significance apart from being "Recognised in Deloitte's technology fast 500 in three consecutive years." WP:ORGCRIT is very strong on requiring sources for companies. A Google search shows up lots of routine business announcements that do not satisfy WP:CORPDEPTH, though I found this, a Sramana Mitra blog post about Dhruva. None of this is enough to build an article out of, but that is not to say that someone could do so in future if the company does something of note. -Lopifalko (talk) 18:34, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete the article fails WP:NSOFT and is not notable. Hughesdarren (talk) 08:59, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete Fails WP:GNG of WP:NSOFT. -- Harshil ^{want to talk?} 04:27, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:NSOFT.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 07:16, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.